This is a Private Members' Bill (under the Ten Minute Rule) which
is sponsored by Anna Firth Conversative MP.
A Bill to amend the Animal Welfare Act 2006 to require a
person in charge of a dog to take all reasonable steps to ensure that that dog
does not fatally injure another dog; and for connected purposes.
https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3466
To Be Printed-Bill 132.
This Bill had its 1sr reading in the Commons in May 2023 and
the 2nd reading is currently scheduled to take place on 24th November
2023.
Further details from the 1st reading:
That leave be given to bring in a Bill to amend the Animal
Welfare Act 2006 to require a person in charge of a dog to take all reasonable
steps to ensure that that dog does not fatally injure another dog; and for
connected purposes.
Britain is undoubtedly a nation of dog lovers, with recent
estimates suggesting that there are 13 million dogs in the UK. In other words,
almost half of all households probably have a dog. For many, a dog is not just
a pet but a much-loved member of the family. Certainly, my predecessor, Sir
David, loved his two pugs, Lily and Bo. My own cavapoochon, Lottie, is a
much-loved member of our family.
Research shows that companionship is the most common reason
for having a dog. That was absolutely the case for my constituent Michael, who
is with us in the Public Gallery. Michael lost his long-standing girlfriend
unexpectedly and suddenly to epilepsy, so, after her death, he adopted her
beautiful, white, fluffy, bichon frisé bitch Emilie—known affectionately as
Millie—both to keep him company and to help him grieve.
Emilie was a wonderful dog. She was gentle, sweet and
obedient, and she totally captured Michael’s heart. However, 18 months ago,
Emilie was savagely attacked by an off-lead, out-of-control dog while on a walk
through the rose garden in Chalkwell Park, Leigh-on-Sea. Michael described the
attack as like watching a horror movie. The dog came at Emilie like a missile
and, although she was on her lead, “shook her like a rag-doll”.
Michael found himself helpless to stop Emilie being torn
apart in front of his eyes. After the attack, he had no option but to carry
Emilie, bleeding and with serious open wounds to her abdomen, to the nearest
vet, where sadly she was put down. Outrageously, the owner of the dog that
attacked Emilie refused to take any responsibility —not even paying the vet’s
bill for euthanasia.
No dog owner or dog should have to go through what Michael
and Emilie experienced. I believe that we would all be devastated if that
happened to our own pet dog, but we would be doubly devastated if, on reporting
the matter to the police, we were told that there is nothing they could do as
it was simply dog on dog. Yet that is exactly what happened to Michael. That is
why I am introducing the Bill.
Sadly, Michael’s experience is far from unique. Since
launching the Bill, I have been inundated with heartbreaking tales from dog
owners all around the country. Blue the collie, Beau the Yorkshire terrier,
Luath the dachshund and Ozzy the cocker spaniel are just some of the names of
beautiful dogs that have been viciously killed by other dogs through no fault
of their own or their owners.
The statistics back up the anecdotal evidence. After the
incident, I submitted freedom of information requests to all 43 police forces
in the UK asking if they record dog-on-dog attacks as a separate offence and,
if so, how many they had recorded over the last 5 years. Shockingly, only 14
police forces currently record a dog-on-dog attack as a separate incident.
However, in 2016 those 14 reported and recorded 1,700 dog-on-dog attacks. Since
lockdown, with everyone buying their covid-19 pandemic puppies, the numbers
have skyrocketed. In 2021, the same 14 police forces recorded 11,559 dog-on-dog
attacks—a 700% increase—with a shocking 2,264 in London alone.
The true incidence of dog-on-dog attacks across the country
is likely to be far greater, since it would be ridiculous to assume that those
attacks occur only in areas where police forces happen to record them. Scaled
up, therefore, there could be as many as 35,000 dog-on-dog attacks each year
across the UK—and increasing. Pet insurance companies have also reported
dog-on-dog attacks to be rising, resulting in vets bills running to many
thousands of pounds for affected households.
Laws, both civil and criminal, have been strengthened in
recent years to protect the public where a dog presents as a risk to public
safety, whether in public or in private, but it remains the case that a dog
owner is not liable to any form of criminal prosecution when their dog fatally
attacks or seriously injures another dog, unless: the other dog is a guide,
assistance or service dog; the dog bites a human; or “there are grounds for
reasonable apprehension that it will injure any person”.
That is, quite simply, not right. Self-evidently, that is
frequently not the case with a dog-on-dog attack, where so often a larger dog
is making a bee-line for a smaller dog. In Michael’s case, he did not fear any
injury to himself, because it was so clear that the dog was going for Emilie.
Ironically, if Emilie had been stolen, not attacked, Michael’s legal remedies
would have been far greater. For starters, under the Theft Act 1968, the
perpetrator could have received up to seven years imprisonment. But because
Emilie was brutally torn apart by someone else’s dog, nothing could be done.
Not surprisingly, this leaves pet owners feeling powerless and deeply
frustrated. It is also no doubt the reason why police forces do not even record
such awful incidents.
Plainly, it is not the dogs that are the problem. Dogs have
owners and every dog owner has a responsibility to ensure their dog does not
fatally attack another one. In addition, there is a growing cohort of evidence
that tackling dog-on-dog aggression and dog attacks in particular may well
prevent a dog from going on and attacking other animals, adults or even
children. As Benjamin Franklin so famously said:
“An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure”,
The Bill seeks to address all those issues. First, amending
the Animal Welfare Act to criminalise fatal dog-on-dog attacks would extend the
same protection to pet dogs that already exist for service, guide and
assistance dogs. Pet dogs are as important to humans as service dogs. Indeed,
when it comes to mental health, all dogs are service dogs.
Secondly, Emilie’s law would empower owners to pursue
justice if their beloved pet is brutally attacked, while not demonising any
particular breed or creating unhelpful stereotypes around certain breeds of
dogs.
Thirdly, the Bill would encourage responsible dog ownership
and animal welfare. Placing the responsibility for a fatal dog attack fairly
and squarely on the person in charge of the dog, and empowering the police to
take action, will have a deterrent effect, thus encouraging more responsible
dog ownership.
Finally, the Bill would compel local police forces to record
dog-on-dog attacks as separate offences, so that, finally, the full scale of
these awful offences can be seen and counted. Passing this law would be a
significant step in the right direction, but its effectiveness will depend
heavily upon enforcement, so we must continue to work closely with the police
and law enforcement agencies to ensure offenders are brought to justice.
I am well aware that most private Member’s Bills never make
the statute book, but I am hopeful that this one will. It would certainly be
extremely popular if it did. Emilie’s law has already garnered a huge amount of
public support. However, if the Bill does not make the statute book, I would
urge the Government to initiate an immediate review of existing laws regarding
dog attacks, with a view to amending the current law to protect pet dogs in a
similar way to service, guide and assistance dogs.
The Bill is about protecting the 13 million dogs across the
country. Most dog owners are responsible, but there must be consequences for
the small minority who are not. This is about dealing with that small minority
who irresponsibly allow their dogs to kill other people’s dogs. By passing the
Bill, not only will we help to make all dogs more secure, we will also make our
parks, our streets, our towns and our cities, especially the new city of
Southend, safer places for us all to live, work and visit.
Question put and agreed to.
Ordered, That Anna Firth, Wayne David, Elliot Colburn, Henry
Smith, Mr Mark Francois, Sir Oliver Heald, Jane Stevenson, Selaine Saxby,
Gareth Johnson, Margaret Ferrier, Damian Green and Peter Gibson present the
Bill.
.jpeg)
